|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011年04 期
| 標題 |
| 城市交通投資與經(jīng)濟增長關(guān)系的實證分析(33 卷) |
| 英文標題 |
| Empirical Analysis on the Relationship between Urban Transport Investment and Economic Growth |
| 摘要 |
| 通過分析北京和紐約城市交通在道路交通設(shè)施、軌道交通設(shè)施、交通投資方面的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀，利用交通投資投入產(chǎn)出模型定量比較北京市與紐約市交通投資與經(jīng)濟增長的關(guān)系。研究結(jié)果表明：交通建設(shè)投資對經(jīng)濟的影響較大，交通業(yè)在國民經(jīng)濟中發(fā)揮著基礎(chǔ)產(chǎn)業(yè)和服務(wù)業(yè)的作用；與紐約相比 |
| 作者 |
| 新聞作者:宗 剛，吳寒冰 |
| 關(guān)鍵字 |
